Indiana v. Edwards

2008

Venue: SCOTUS

Facts: Edwards steals a pair of shoes from a department store and gets in a shootout on his way out, wounding a bystander. He's got some pretty serious mental issues, and wants to represent himself.

Posture: Incompetent to stand trial; then he gets competent. Denied the right to represent himself; convicted at trial. Ct. App. orders a new trial. Affirmed by IN SC.

Issue: Is the right to self-representation absolute?

Holding: No. Vacated and remanded.

Rule: A judge can take a realistic appraisal of a defendant's mental capacity when deciding whether to allow a defendant to self-represent.

Reasoning: There's a difference between being competent enough to stand trial and being competent to represent yourself.

Dicta: Scalia, dissenting: no, this is a personal right. The state's view of what's fair isn't the end-all here. By the way, we're trying to mainstream people with mental troubles, and here we're denying them a basic right.