United States v. Cronic

1984

Venue: SCOTUS

Facts: After 4.5 years of building a case, the defendant is charged with a complex mail fraud scheme. Retained counsel withdraws just before trial and appointed counsel, a young real estate practitioner, has just 25 days to prepare or trial.

Posture: Two codefendants testify for the government and our hero is found guilty on 11 or 13 counts. Reversed on appeal on 6A grounds.

Issue: Did Ct. App. correctly interpret 6A when it inferred that there had not been effective assistance of counsel?

Holding: No. Reversed.

Rule: You need to be able to point out specific errors, not just a general error-prone atmosphere.

Reasoning: We're after truth here. If we rely on inferences, we're not getting it.

Dicta: