Was the analogy to corporate law necessary? Probably not, but it lends a little authority, since the LLC statutes are new.
Note that if a creditor gets a seat on the board, the boardmembers have a fiduciary duty to the company and the shareholders, not the creditor. That sort of an up-in-the air thing: is this a reasonable approach?
The 3-tiered structure immitates corporate management structure: it's good when you have many investors.
He may have had a meeting (with himself), but there was nothing in writing. So there are these forms, with signature lines, that make it look like Mitchell was also a director (the foreign corporation certificate). So at least McDermott, Will thought there were two directors.
Now that doesn't have the legal effect of appointing directors, but this is evidence that Grant acknowledges that Mitchell is a director.
But then also, the lawyers are doing some pretty egregious stuff.
But the moral of the story is that when you're creating this sort of entity, know the steps and follow them, or there will be troubles.
No.
§ 157 does not allow officers to issue rights: only directors can issue rights. The CEO can't do this.