Communities for Equity v Michigan High School Athletic Assn

1999

Check this out:
  1. Numerosity/impracticality of joinder. Yes, there are thousands.
  2. Commonality. They have different individual harms, but the basic question is whether MHSAA discriminated.
  3. Typicality. The differences between sports are way less important than the similarities of the overall alleged conduct.
  4. Adequacy of representation. Maybe not all class members have the same interests, but those who don't want this will be represented by the plaintiffs. The counsel are certainly qualified.
  5. What type of class. This is a 23(b)(2) class: injunctive relief only
Venue: W.D. Mich

Facts: Girls sports are pretty uch getting the shaft.

Posture: Motion for class certification.

Issue: Can we certify a class of "all present and future female students enrolled in MHSAA schools who..blablabla...adversely affected"

Holding: Yes.

Rule: Rule 23

Reasoning:

Dicta: