Hinrichs v. Bosma

2006

Venue: Ct. App. 7th Cir.

Facts: IN legislature kicks meetings off with a prayer. They talk about wanting it to be ecumenical, but sometimes it's quite strongly Christian.

Posture: District court finds forplaintiffs.

Issue: Does this practice violate the establishment clause?

Holding: In form, no, because there's the aspiration to be ecumenical, but in practice, by tolerating the failure to do so, it does.

Rule: The content of prayer is not of concerne to judges, unless there's an indication that the opportunity has been explouted to advance one (or disparage another) faith or belief.

Reasoning: The history and tradition of the constitution tolerate prayer, but the government can't do things that have the effect of affiliating the government with any one specific faith or belief.

Dicta: