Rapanos v.United States

2006

Venue: SCOTUS

Facts: Something about wetlands and the army corps of engineers.

Posture: Unclear.

Issue: Apparently, what are "the waters of the United States?" This is about the Clean Water Act.

Holding: They include certain wetlands, that's for sure.

Rule: Dictionary definition of waters, text of CWA. The fact that it says "navigable waters" encompases things that directly feed navigable waters.

Reasoning: The purpose of the law is to maintain the integrity of the nations waters. This has only a speculative connection.

Dicta: Dissent: federal agencies are empowered to interpret regulations.