| Venue: | SCOTUS |
| Facts: | Segregated fees are disbursed by SGA and also by referendum to various organizations. |
| Posture: | District court and Ct App invalidate the program as a violation of 1A. |
| Issue: | Does this violate free speech, free association, and free exercise? |
| Holding: | Not necessarily. Remanded. |
| Rule: | A university can collect fees to fund extracurricular activities if the program is viewpoint-neutral. The referendum policy is not that, though. |
| Reasoning: | The university is free to determine that students would benefit in dynamic discussions of all sorts of issues, and it can impose a fee to make that happen. It just can't prefer some viewpoints to others. |
| Dicta: | |