| Venue: | Wis. Ct. App. |
| Facts: | Pharmacist declines to provide contraceptives, and gets reprimanded. |
| Posture: | Appeal from pharmacy board's decision |
| Issue: | Did Noesen depart from the standard of care ordinarily exercised by a pharmacise in a way that harmed or could have harmed the patient? |
| Holding: | Yes. |
| Rule: | The standard of care is clear, and was known to him. |
| Reasoning: | There is an exception for the right of conscience (4-part test articulated in case), but he didn't fulfil his part of it, so we don't need to consider the rest. |
| Dicta: | |