Sweatt v. Painter

1950

Venue: SCOTUS

Facts: Sweatt was denied admission to the U of TX law school. It was a nice school. TX has opened a new law school at the TX State U for Negroes. It has some nice things going for it, but it's not in the same league, by any metric.

Posture: Looks like there was a judgment for the defendants below.

Issue: Is the availability of this option sufficient to discharge TX's obligations to its citizens?

Holding: No. Reversed. Admit him to U of TX Law School.

Rule: Substantial equality is required.

Reasoning: Nobody who had a free choice about which school to attend would ever go to the new one. At the new school, 85% of the TX population is excluded, and that will include most of the lawyers, witnesses, judges, and other officials with whom graduates could expect to deal. This offends equal protection.

Dicta: