| Venue: | E.D.Wis. |
| Facts: | The UW "Design for Diversity" includes speech restrictions. The restriction is crafted by the Law School, apparently, and requires intent to demean or intimidate. There have been at least 9 instances where students were sanctioned. |
| Posture: | Lawsuit, presumably to enjoin enforcement. |
| Issue: | Is this invalid because it is facially overbroad? |
| Holding: | Why yes, yes it is. |
| Rule: | Must be narrowly tailored. |
| Reasoning: | 1A generally protects against contend-based regulation, but not 100%. There's the fighting words doctrine. But this rule restricts discriminatory speech regardless of whether it's likely to start a fight. |
| Dicta: | |