Court: |
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division |
|
Facts: |
Plaintiffs bought computers, and have problems with the terms of
the warranty, which include an arbitration clause incorporating
by reference some rules that are not readily available. |
|
Posture: |
Finding for the defendants at trial. |
|
Issue: |
Is the arbitration clause valid? |
|
Holding: |
No. Remanded to the court to designate an appropriate arbitrator. |
|
Rule: |
The FAA means that arbitration clauses are enforceable, but this
one goes too far by basically preventing substantive
arbitration: costs vastly exceed the price of the
disagreement (i.e., the cost of a computer), and the rules
are hidden. |
|
Reasoning: |
NY law requires both procedural and substantive unconscionability.
We have those both here. |
|
Dicta: |
The purpose here is not to redress inequality between the parties, but
rather to ensure that one party can't surprise the other with
overly oppressive terms. |