| Court: | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
| Facts: | Nothing new. |
| Posture: | Just like last time, except that there's been an appeal. |
| Issue: | Did the court of appeals exceed its authority by making factual determinations? |
| Holding: | Yes. Remanded to the trial court to resolve issues of fact. |
| Rule: | The trial court needs to determine whether Wurtz's act was wrongful. Threats to do something you have a legal right to do don't constitute duress. |
| Reasoning: | The decision of the court of appeals implies that the trial court did not make all the findings of fact needed. So it should go back to them. |
| Dicta: | |