| Court: | Federal Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit |
| Facts: | Haas kills Stanlick and almost kills Risch. |
| Posture: | Convicted at trial, affirmed on appeal. Federal district court denies his appeal. |
| Issue: | Is excluding psychological testimony on the basis of relevance or competency violative of due process? |
| Holding: | Affirmed; Wisconsin's standards are reasonable. |
| Rule: | Intent is different from insanity. You can be crazy and still intend to do stuff. |
| Reasoning: | Wisconsin is saved by bifurcated process: determination of guilt and determination of sanity are separate. |
| Dicta: | |