Court: | CD Circuit Court of Appeals |
Facts: | Defendant was a neglectful caretaker of another woman's children. One of them died of malnutrition. |
Posture: | Guilty of involuntary manslaughter at trial. |
Issue: | Should the jury have been instructed about finding a legal duty of care? |
Holding: | Yes. A legal duty of care is a critical element of this crime. Remanded. |
Rule: |
A neglected duty must be a legal duty, not just a moral duty, and
failure to perform the duty must be the immediate and direct cause of
death.
There are four situations in which a failure to act is a breach of legal duty:
|
Reasoning: | There are conflicts in the evidence about items 3 and 4 above, so a jury should have had to decide. There was no instruction to the juty, so therefore they didn't decide. That's error. |
Dicta: | Cases involving duty to act are rare. |