| Court: | Wisconsin Court of Appeals |
| Facts: | Guiden got drunk and burgled. He pled guilty, and his accomplice's testimony (Norwood) was read into the record. Now Guiden wishes not to be in prison, so he asks for a new trial. |
| Posture: | Pled guilty, sentenced. |
| Issue: | Was he intoxicated to the point of not being able to form the intent to burglarize? |
| Holding: | Affirmed: there's no basis in the record for this assertion. |
| Rule: | Capacity to form intent is to be inferred from conduct. |
| Reasoning: | The conduct supports an inference of intent. |
| Dicta: | We're not just talking about lowered inhibitions. |