Court: |
US Supreme Court |
|
Facts: |
Brady and Boblitt were convicted of murder. Turns out Boblitt was
the killer, and confessed. The confession was not made known
to Brady's defense until after the sentencing and appeal. |
|
Posture: |
Trial, conviction, sentencing, appeal. Now a new appeal; court of
appeals finds this to have been a violation of 14A Due Process,
appealed to USSC. |
|
Issue: |
Was the suppression of this evidence a violation of due process? |
|
Holding: |
Yes. |
|
Rule: |
The US wins whenever the courts do justice |
|
Reasoning: |
Depriving a defendant of the means of defense is a violation of
due process. |
|
Dicta: |
|