Brady v. Maryland

1963

Court: US Supreme Court

Facts: Brady and Boblitt were convicted of murder. Turns out Boblitt was the killer, and confessed. The confession was not made known to Brady's defense until after the sentencing and appeal.

Posture: Trial, conviction, sentencing, appeal. Now a new appeal; court of appeals finds this to have been a violation of 14A Due Process, appealed to USSC.

Issue: Was the suppression of this evidence a violation of due process?

Holding: Yes.

Rule: The US wins whenever the courts do justice

Reasoning: Depriving a defendant of the means of defense is a violation of due process.

Dicta: