| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Facts: | There was a fatal hit-and-run. Police set up a checkpoint at the same time and place of the collision to see if anyone could provide information. Lidster drove erratically, and was charged with drunk driving. |
| Posture: | Dunno... |
| Issue: | Did the checkpoint violate the Fourth Amendement? |
| Holding: | No. |
| Rule: | The interests, once again, are balanced. |
| Reasoning: | The police had a specific, circumscribed objective, the situation was one of grave concern, and the impact on drivers was minimal. |
| Dicta: | |