| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Facts: | Fight results in death. Witnesses dispute who did the shooting (i.e., maybe it was the victim's brother). |
| Posture: | convicted at trial: the judge refused to allow unspecified witnesses to testify |
| Issue: | Did excluding these witnesses violate Compulsory Process pretections in 6a? |
| Holding: | No. The conviction is affirmed. |
| Rule: | There's no unlimited right to present evidence that is incompetent, privileged, or otherwise inadmissable. |
| Reasoning: | The judge pretty much thought that witnesses would be "found" who weren't really witnesses. |
| Dicta: | |