Venue: |
NJ SC
|
|
Facts: |
Mt. Laurel zones to keep out the poor. Higher density housing and
more children means increased drain on services, mandating more
taxes. So it's total self-interest. |
|
Posture: |
Trial court found the zoning was unlawful. |
|
Issue: |
Can a developing municipality zone in such a way that it is either
physically or commercially impossible to provide low or moderate
income housing, and thereby exclude people? |
|
Holding: |
No: every municipality must take its fair share. |
|
Rule: |
Municipalities must affirmatively provide opportunities; unintentional
exclusion is just as bad as intentional. |
|
Reasoning: |
This is a constitutional issue. Zoning power is a delegation of the
police power, and therefore must be exercised for the general
welfare of the citizens. There might be some exceptional
circumstances owing to environmental factors, e.g. |
|
Dicta: |
|
|