Court: | US Supreme Court |
Facts: | A complex series of transactions leads to Burnet buying some property from Symmes, who couldn't really be selling it. |
Posture: | Appeal from an act of ejectment. |
Issue: | Are the facts sufficient to establish adverse possession? |
Holding: | Yes. |
Rule: | All we need are visible and notorious acts of ownership. |
Reasoning: | For 21 years, this guy acted like he owned it: removing sand and gravel, etc. |
Dicta: |