Ewing v. Burnet

1837

Court: US Supreme Court

Facts: A complex series of transactions leads to Burnet buying some property from Symmes, who couldn't really be selling it.

Posture: Appeal from an act of ejectment.

Issue: Are the facts sufficient to establish adverse possession?

Holding: Yes.

Rule: All we need are visible and notorious acts of ownership.

Reasoning: For 21 years, this guy acted like he owned it: removing sand and gravel, etc.

Dicta: