| Court: | DC Court of Appeals |
| Facts: | Appellants want to convert an apartment complex into condos. There's a statute saying that this would require 50% approval from the residents. |
| Posture: | Dunno. |
| Issue: | Is this statute valid? |
| Holding: | Yes. |
| Rule: | It's not an impermissible delegation to allow the benificiaries of a law to waive their protection. |
| Reasoning: | It's not a taking if someone is denied the most profitable use of their property-- this is the natural result of much regulation, after all. |
| Dicta: | Dissent: don't look to CA SC for constitutional guidance. |