| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Facts: | 19 revisions of the plan, over five years. Promises to remove ice plant and restore buckwheat for an endangered butterfly. Still no permit. Time to sue. |
| Posture: | Appeal from findings for Del Monte Dunes |
| Issue: | Was there error? |
| Holding: | No |
| Rule: | See reasoning |
| Reasoning: | There's no requirement of rough proportionality when development is denied altogether. The city proposed the jury instructions; they can't complain about them now. This is a cause of action. |
| Dicta: | |