Court: |
PA Supreme Court |
|
Facts: |
Retimeyers rented a house. Mrs. Reitmeyer falls and injures
herself as a result of a defect in the porch. The defect was
present when the lease was executed. |
|
Posture: |
Appeal from trial, presumably finding for Sprecher, the landlord. |
|
Issue: |
Is a landlord who fails fulfill the promise to fix defects known
at the time of the lease liable in tort for injuries caused
thereby? |
|
Holding: |
Yes. |
|
Rule: |
We overrule our prior precedent and adopt R2T § 357. |
|
Reasoning: |
Tenants leasing defective premises are likely to be poor. Landlords
assume limited obligations in exchange for rent. It's a special
relationship, and tenants will rely on landlords for repairs.
Landlords retain control over the premises. Tenants don't
bargain freely. |
|
Dicta: |
Dissent: certainty and stability are essential; this will depress
property interests. This flies in the face of stare decisis,
parol evidence, contributory negligence, and assumption of
risk. |