| Court: | CA Supreme Court |
| Facts: | You can't convert a residential hotel hotel to tourist without a permit. To get the permit, you need to pay an in lieu fee or preserve some residential units. San Remo paid $567K in fees. |
| Posture: | Suit saying the fees should be subject to Nollen/Dolan review because they are discretionary. |
| Issue: | Do these merit the nexus and rough proportionality test? |
| Holding: | Not really. |
| Rule: | Taking money is different from real property. |
| Reasoning: | There actually is a reasonable nexus here (to loss of housing), and these fees are related. All regulation burdens us, but we benefit from it greatly, also. |
| Dicta: | Dissent: property must be secured, or liberty can not exist. |