| Court: | NJ Supreme Court |
| Facts: | Same as last tie. Nothing has changed. |
| Posture: | Presumably a new action came along, but it is not noted. |
| Issue: | Same. |
| Holding: | Municipal land use regulations that conflict with the general welfare [...] abuse police power and are unconstitutional. |
| Rule: | We are going to retain jurisdiction in cases where a municipality has not taken action, and supervise effective zoning. |
| Reasoning: | The public welfare is more than just the community at hand. |
| Dicta: | We prefer legislative action to judicial action, but apparently nobody is doing anything. We want more than just the lowering of barriers: we want mandatory set-asides. |